Est. 2026 · Miami, Florida

The Florida Council on Artificial Intelligence

Independent, nonpartisan advisory body building the policy infrastructure Florida's AI economy requires but does not yet have.

Florida attracted $4.89 billion in venture capital in 2024 and $830 million in AI-specific funding in the first half of 2025 alone. It has enacted zero AI policy frameworks.

$4.89B
Florida venture capital, 2024
Pitchbook
$830M
AI-focused funding, Miami metro, H1 2025 alone
eMerge Insights
2.3%
FL students enrolled in computer science
Code.org
0
State AI policy frameworks enacted
FL Legislature
FOR AI COMPANIES FOR LEGISLATORS & STAFF FOR UNIVERSITIES FOR INVESTORS

The Landscape

Palantir moved its headquarters to Aventura. D-Wave is relocating to Boca Raton. ServiceNow announced an AI innovation hub in West Palm Beach. More than 30 firms relocated or expanded to South Florida in 2024-2025. Thirty-three percent of funded Florida companies identified artificial intelligence as a primary business function in the first half of 2025. Miami ranks fifth nationally as a startup ecosystem. Florida ranks sixth in venture capital deal value.

No entity in the state connects twelve university AI programs to the employers funding 270 venture deals per half-year. No advisory body translates AI capabilities into legislation the House and Senate can act on. No system identifies at-risk occupations before displacement reaches Florida's 9.3 million-person workforce.

The Governor proposes an AI Bill of Rights. The House Speaker argues AI is a federal issue. Arkansas, Maryland, South Carolina, Nebraska, Nevada, and Virginia now mandate computer science education. Ohio has funded 50,000 technology credentials through its TechCred program. Virginia committed $1.1 billion to tech talent through the Tech Talent Investment Program. Colorado enacted the nation's first AI liability law. New York launched a $400 million public-private AI computing consortium. Florida has done none of these things. The Council exists to close that gap before the 2027 legislative session makes it permanent.

Our Approach

The Council produces four categories of work: original policy research grounded in Florida-specific data, legislative analysis delivered before each session, competitiveness benchmarking against peer states, and legal infrastructure design for AI business formation. Every publication is nonpartisan, evidence-based, and freely available.

We do not lobby. We do not advocate for specific companies. We produce the research that lobbyists, legislators, universities, and companies need to make informed decisions. Our model is Brookings at the state level: quality, independence, impact.

The Council's geographic scope is statewide. Our research covers all 67 Florida counties, from the defense and aerospace corridor along the Panhandle to the fintech concentration in South Florida. AI policy that serves only Miami is not AI policy for Florida.

The Gap

The Associated Industries of Florida assembled Google, Meta, and Amazon to lobby against state-level AI regulation. The Florida Chamber of Commerce published an AI Readiness Index but operates no AI workforce or policy program. The Florida Technology Council has two full-time staff and no AI research capacity. eMerge Americas announced a "Florida AI Council" in December 2025; three months later, it has no members, no website, and no publications. No organization in Florida is producing independent, evidence-based AI policy for the state. There are entities that lobby. There are entities that convene. There is no entity that builds.

What Other States Have Built

  • Ohio TechCred: 50,000+ AI/tech credentials funded
  • Virginia TTIP: $1.1B committed to tech talent
  • Colorado SB24-205: AI liability framework
  • New York Empire AI: $400M computing consortium
  • California AB 2876: K-12 AI literacy framework
  • Utah: First regulatory sandbox for AI/fintech

What Florida Has Built

  • SB 7054: Government AI procurement framework
  • SB 1680: Government generative AI transparency
  • No private-sector AI liability framework
  • No AI workforce program
  • No AI regulatory sandbox
  • No K-12 AI education mandate

Research Standards

Council publications are produced under a five-stage review process: primary data collection from state and federal sources, independent analysis by Council researchers, subject-matter review by relevant board members, external peer review by at least one qualified expert, and final editorial review for accuracy and accessibility.

The Council does not accept funding from entities whose products or policies are under active Council review. Every statistic is sourced. Every policy recommendation is tied to a specific statutory mechanism. Our analysis can be handed to a committee staffer, a general counsel, or a university provost and used without qualification.

Agenda

01

Education Reform

Arkansas, Maryland, South Carolina, Nebraska, Nevada, and Virginia now mandate computer science education. California developed a K-12 AI literacy framework with Stanford. Florida meets five of nine Code.org benchmark policies for computer science education. Only 2.3% of Florida's 2.9 million K-12 students are enrolled in a foundational computer science course. The state has no CS graduation requirement, no dedicated CS education office, no funded teacher pipeline, and no AI literacy framework. Approximately 1,200 certified CS teachers serve 2.9 million students.

UF AI Initiative: $70M+ invested since 2020, 230+ AI courses, 100 strategic AI faculty hires. Bright Futures: ~110,000 students, $600M+ annually, with no AI-specific enhancements. The Council's agenda: coordinate 12 state universities, the USF Bellini College of AI, and 28 state colleges into a unified, employer-integrated pipeline. Propose AI enhancements to the Bright Futures scholarship and expand the CAPE certification framework to include AI industry credentials.
02

Workforce Transition

Ohio has funded over 50,000 technology credentials through its TechCred program since 2019, reimbursing employers up to $2,000 per credential. Virginia committed $1.1 billion to tech talent through the Tech Talent Investment Program. Florida vetoed its own AI workforce study. The state has 1.4 million veterans, 20 military installations, a defense sector generating $100B+ annually and 860,000+ jobs, and no AI-specific transition program.

1.4 million veterans. 20 military installations. Zero AI-specific transition programs. The Council's Veterans to AI initiative connects Department of Defense SkillBridge placements to state college AI certificates and employer matching through CareerSource Florida. The Council's agenda: develop predictive displacement models across Florida's 67 counties, design an AI micro-credential framework for the state college system serving ~800,000 students, and build the first statewide pipeline from military service to AI employment.
03

Legal Infrastructure

No state has established an AI-specialized business court. No state has a private-sector AI liability framework. Colorado's SB24-205, the most ambitious attempt, takes effect in February 2026. Florida's only AI legislation covers government procurement. Delaware generates $2.4 billion annually from corporate formation law, built on a single specialized court that adjudicates disputes for 66% of Fortune 500 companies. The state that builds equivalent infrastructure for AI captures a comparable structural advantage.

Delaware model: $2.4B annually from corporate formation law. 66% of Fortune 500 incorporated in Delaware. The Council's agenda: design the legal infrastructure that makes Florida the default jurisdiction for AI business formation, including an AI regulatory sandbox modeled on Utah's program, clear liability allocation for multi-party AI systems, and FDUTPA enforcement guidance for AI applications.
04

Industry Competitiveness

Sixth nationally in venture capital deal value. Ranked in the bottom third of states for AI readiness by the Florida Chamber of Commerce's own index. AI-focused funding in the Miami metro reached $830 million in the first half of 2025, nearly matching all of 2024. Palantir, D-Wave, ServiceNow, Varonis, and more than 30 other firms relocated or expanded in 2024-2025. Florida has no R&D tax incentives for AI development, no state procurement framework for AI systems, and no structured talent retention strategy for AI researchers.

33% of funded Florida companies cited AI as a primary business function in H1 2025. 30+ firms relocated or expanded to South Florida, 2024-2025. The Council's agenda: produce a quarterly competitiveness index benchmarking Florida against the top five AI states, advise on targeted incentive structures, and develop the data infrastructure to make relocation decisions evidence-based rather than anecdotal.

Publication Pipeline

Founding Board

The founding board is limited to seven seats, structured so that no single sector - industry, government, academia, or capital - holds a majority. Three commitments have been received. The inaugural publication ships Q2 2026.

Founding members participate in quarterly convenings, contribute to agenda working groups, receive advance access to all Council publications, and review draft policy recommendations before release. Membership is by invitation and application.

Board candidates are evaluated on three criteria: domain expertise in AI policy, workforce development, or legal infrastructure; active engagement with Florida's AI ecosystem; and ability to contribute to at least one Council working group. Founding board membership is not honorary.

Request Consideration →
Represented Constituencies

AI Companies & Startups

Companies building or deploying artificial intelligence systems in Florida, from early-stage to public.

State Government & Policy

Senior policy practitioners, legislative staff, and agency leadership engaged in AI governance.

Universities & Research Institutions

State university system leadership, AI program directors, and the state college network.

Investors & Venture Capital

Funds deploying capital into Florida's AI ecosystem and advising portfolio companies on state policy.

Legal & Regulatory

Practitioners shaping AI liability frameworks, regulatory compliance, and enforcement guidance.

Board Expectations

Quarterly Convenings

Four structured sessions annually with prepared briefing materials and agenda working groups.

Publication Review

Advance review of all Council publications before release. Board feedback shapes final recommendations.

Network Access

Founding members receive all Council research, legislative forecasts, and industry briefings as produced.